| any new clarifications? | |
|
|
|
Author | Message |
---|
Shiba Sensei TATTOED, ELEMENTAL MASTER
Posts : 2762 Join date : 2010-03-08 Location : Phoenix Refugees Temple
| Subject: Re: any new clarifications? Mon Sep 12, 2011 11:57 am | |
| Masikip na sa theme o sa deck kung isasama ko pa nun. Maswerte lang ako sa KOTEI na wala akong nakaharap na dishonor. breeder lang. at yung hinayupak na ninja at shadow play na yun... | |
|
| |
Yasui CHAMP, THE KOLAT
Posts : 6934 Join date : 2010-03-17
| Subject: Re: any new clarifications? Mon Sep 12, 2011 4:33 pm | |
| haha asa k p s chaggy army ah hahahahhah pero d nga at least need natin ng meta sa dishonoring kasi rampant sya kung check nyo ang mga tourney results madalas me scorp dishonor,crane embassy,phoenix or dragon dishonor dun at least isa so medyo rampant sya sa military kasi me pag asa tayo depende sa clash ng mga tao natin kaso sa dishonor time bomb sya at mas mananig ang diskarte so dapat maging familiarize tayo sa mga banat nila | |
|
| |
Shiba Sensei TATTOED, ELEMENTAL MASTER
Posts : 2762 Join date : 2010-03-08 Location : Phoenix Refugees Temple
| Subject: Re: any new clarifications? Wed Sep 14, 2011 11:07 am | |
| senpai clarification lang sa card ng TPW baka sakali nabasa mo na sha pakilinaw ang gamit nung card na "two men at a river" sorry ha pag may copy nako nung card na yun post ko yung ginagawa may tanong clarifications ako dun sa battle action nya. sorry kulang pa intel ko eh plano ko sana gamitin. para maiba sa environment.
| |
|
| |
yoritomo raizen ALL CLAN SENSEI, THE GUIDANCE
Posts : 7039 Join date : 2010-03-17
| Subject: Re: any new clarifications? Wed Sep 14, 2011 11:19 am | |
| Type Strategy Title Two Men At A River Rarity Common Edition The Plague War [ View Printings ] Text Focus Effect: In this duel's resolution, if the difference between each player's total score in the duel is 2 or less, the duel is a tie. Battle: In this battle's resolution, if the difference between each army's total Force is 4 or less, and there are one or more units on both sides, the battle is a tie. Gold 0 Focus 3 Flavor "Two strangers, perfectly matched, meet and face off at a crossroads. Such is the stuff of legend." - Shosuro Atesharu Legality Celestial, Open
un trait nya: pag sya ang nareveal sa focus ng mga ngdduelo pag un difference ng total chi score nila ay mgkaiba lng by a value of 2, auto tabla un laban.
same sa battle pero sa force naman. pag ngbilangan at 4 ang diffence ng total. tabla un. | |
|
| |
Yasui CHAMP, THE KOLAT
Posts : 6934 Join date : 2010-03-17
| Subject: Re: any new clarifications? Wed Sep 14, 2011 12:30 pm | |
| suicide...hahahah tabla n kung tabla | |
|
| |
Shiba Sensei TATTOED, ELEMENTAL MASTER
Posts : 2762 Join date : 2010-03-08 Location : Phoenix Refugees Temple
| Subject: Re: any new clarifications? Thu Sep 15, 2011 9:06 am | |
| Yan nga yun cards na yun, tama yun na nga kung 4 or less ibig sabihin nun regardless sha na kung whatever tabla kung tabla. Kung tabla auto death kayo pareho di ba? yun naman ang rulings nun sa battle. So kung tabla kayo di ba there is also an honor gain not just you but at the enemy's side as well?
| |
|
| |
Yasui CHAMP, THE KOLAT
Posts : 6934 Join date : 2010-03-17
| Subject: Re: any new clarifications? Thu Sep 15, 2011 9:21 am | |
| depende s theme pero dapat ang aim mo lumamang or gagamitin moito pang stall ng kalaban i smell honor runnning or slander here | |
|
| |
Shiba Sensei TATTOED, ELEMENTAL MASTER
Posts : 2762 Join date : 2010-03-08 Location : Phoenix Refugees Temple
| Subject: Re: any new clarifications? Sun Sep 18, 2011 9:57 am | |
| | |
|
| |
yoritomo raizen ALL CLAN SENSEI, THE GUIDANCE
Posts : 7039 Join date : 2010-03-17
| Subject: Re: any new clarifications? Mon Sep 19, 2011 7:57 am | |
| can you smeeeeeellllllllllll what the coach is cooking!!!! -the Rock (WWE) | |
|
| |
Yasui CHAMP, THE KOLAT
Posts : 6934 Join date : 2010-03-17
| Subject: Re: any new clarifications? Mon Sep 19, 2011 8:52 am | |
| Moreno pakiclarify ung Chugo Seido kasi naglaban kami nina kua ollie this what happens
4f si akodo kobi at nasa battle sya me plus 4f sya due to tactical action so total is 8f nag ranged 6 ako targeting her then nag amplify ako ng ranged attack by 2 so abot n sya... then nagchugo seido sya kay akodo kurogane na maliit lang ung force ang question nila dun ay madidiscard b ung amplifier card ko ng ranged attack??
ang sagot ko ay eto since nilipat mo ung targeting kay kurogane....at mas maliit sya and no need to amplify the ranged attack babalik s kamay ko ung card....kasi enough n kay kurogane same with ruthlesss...nirtuhless mo si kuon..12g sya in total...tapos chugo..... nilipat kay yaheiko kunwari n 9g for ruthless.....so babawasan ng player na nagplay ng ruthless ung binayad nya by 3g kasi nalipat n kay yaheiko ung targeting
ang alam ko aksi in the first place pagka anounce at targeting nung atatck dapat gamitin n ung chugo para maibagsak n lahat nung reactions
paki correct lang if mali | |
|
| |
Shiba Sensei TATTOED, ELEMENTAL MASTER
Posts : 2762 Join date : 2010-03-08 Location : Phoenix Refugees Temple
| Subject: Re: any new clarifications? Mon Sep 19, 2011 11:13 am | |
| - Yasui wrote:
- Moreno pakiclarify ung Chugo Seido
kasi naglaban kami nina kua ollie this what happens
4f si akodo kobi at nasa battle sya me plus 4f sya due to tactical action so total is 8f nag ranged 6 ako targeting her then nag amplify ako ng ranged attack by 2 so abot n sya... then nagchugo seido sya kay akodo kurogane na maliit lang ung force ang question nila dun ay madidiscard b ung amplifier card ko ng ranged attack??
ang sagot ko ay eto since nilipat mo ung targeting kay kurogane....at mas maliit sya and no need to amplify the ranged attack babalik s kamay ko ung card....kasi enough n kay kurogane same with ruthlesss...nirtuhless mo si kuon..12g sya in total...tapos chugo..... nilipat kay yaheiko kunwari n 9g for ruthless.....so babawasan ng player na nagplay ng ruthless ung binayad nya by 3g kasi nalipat n kay yaheiko ung targeting
ang alam ko aksi in the first place pagka anounce at targeting nung atatck dapat gamitin n ung chugo para maibagsak n lahat nung reactions
paki correct lang if mali Pre, wala ka na galang talaga ah, mukhang gusto mong mapadali buhay mo pagdating nang B.F. mo na galing sa malayong lugar? Di kumpleto yung kwento mo ano yung ginamit mong pangamplify? Kasi ang sa akin lang kung nagamit mo na at inamplify mo na agad pagkatapos mo targeting pagchinugo mo na yung card diskarded din yung amplification na card. Yasui: Range 6 Boss: ok not enough. Yasui: React, +2 strength Boss: Ah ganun pala, sige chugo kay____ Resolve action: nilipat ang target eh, inamplify mo na nilipat so discarded din ang amplification card. Pero kung gusto mong mas-formal at masscientific explanation eh ang BF mo na ang bahala dun. pwede ko rin i-try sagutin yan pero next time ko na gagawin naka-online ka eh. | |
|
| |
yoritomo raizen ALL CLAN SENSEI, THE GUIDANCE
Posts : 7039 Join date : 2010-03-17
| Subject: Re: any new clarifications? Mon Sep 19, 2011 11:25 am | |
| e2 pagkakaintindi ko dyan. magkaiba ang example mo na RA at ruthless.
and ruthless kasi ang steps. a) target *reactions are open now starting with active player.dapat mgreact na un kalaban kasi after nun resolve na agad un ruthless* *once na settled na target tsaka mafifixed un price at choice nung me ari kung babayaran ba o ndi* b)resolve.
and RA iba
hanggat di pa enough ang RA ay pwede walang gawin yung kalaban. pero once na maging enough na pwede pa din mgreact ang kalaban mo kasi taking turns pa din kau sa reaction. so pwede nya ilipat.
a) target *reactions are open now starting with active player*
a.1) you have a chance to amplify ur RA. a.2) pag ndi pa enough ang RA mo. pwede mag pass ang kalaban. a.3) kunwari di pa din kaya ng RA mo. amplify mo uli a.4) kita ng kalaban mo kaya mo na mapatay un target. gagamitin na nya ang turn nya for reaction. gamit sya chugo. change target.
b) resolve.check na uli ngaun kung enough pumatay ng RA mo.
so. wala kang refund ng actions kasi ginawa mo talaga. sa ruthless kasi una pa lng di ka pa required mgbayad. kelangan muna mgresolve un target bago mgbayad.
| |
|
| |
yoritomo raizen ALL CLAN SENSEI, THE GUIDANCE
Posts : 7039 Join date : 2010-03-17
| Subject: Re: any new clarifications? Mon Sep 19, 2011 11:27 am | |
| in short tama si coach. haha sabay pala kaming ngpost ni coach. nauna lng sya konti. | |
|
| |
Shiba Sensei TATTOED, ELEMENTAL MASTER
Posts : 2762 Join date : 2010-03-08 Location : Phoenix Refugees Temple
| Subject: Re: any new clarifications? Mon Sep 19, 2011 11:32 am | |
| oops sorry baka mali akong pagbasa niruthless mo pala kung ganun sayang gold mo pre wala kang magagawa dun nagchugo nasunog gold mo pre. Although magandang example din sana yung akin. regarding sa RA's valid point din naman yun, tama ba senpai?
| |
|
| |
yoritomo raizen ALL CLAN SENSEI, THE GUIDANCE
Posts : 7039 Join date : 2010-03-17
| Subject: Re: any new clarifications? Mon Sep 19, 2011 11:35 am | |
| ndi coach. un nga sabi ng post ko sa taas. ndi appplicable ang masayangan ng gold sa ruthless. kasi masesettle lng ang price na kylangan bayaran pag ngagree na ang player sa targetting. hanggat open pa for redirection wala pang need bayaran. | |
|
| |
Shiba Sensei TATTOED, ELEMENTAL MASTER
Posts : 2762 Join date : 2010-03-08 Location : Phoenix Refugees Temple
| Subject: Re: any new clarifications? Mon Sep 19, 2011 11:43 am | |
| AAAAAAAAAAhhhhhhhh... Okay mali uli pagbasa at intindi sorry mukhang inaantok nako... konti nalang at kailangan nang matulog.
| |
|
| |
Yasui CHAMP, THE KOLAT
Posts : 6934 Join date : 2010-03-17
| Subject: Re: any new clarifications? Tue Sep 20, 2011 1:30 pm | |
| ok salamat s clarification buti kasi clinarify ko.. ganun kasi ung deck n ginagawa ko now.. puro amplifier ng ranged attack | |
|
| |
Shiba Sensei TATTOED, ELEMENTAL MASTER
Posts : 2762 Join date : 2010-03-08 Location : Phoenix Refugees Temple
| Subject: Re: any new clarifications? Mon Oct 10, 2011 10:09 am | |
| The Comprehensive Rules were not updated when The Plague War was released because we had not yet made the change for Emperor Edition that mandatory targeting will be in the constraints block. The entry in the Glossary for Perform now says:
A Personality or Follower is performing an action if its controller is the player taking the action (or, if the Personality or Follower is out of play, if its owner is the player taking the action), and any of these things is true:
The action is from an ability on the Personality or Follower. The action is from an ability on an Item or Spell in the Personality’s unit. EXCEPTION: Actions on an Item or Spell that attach the Item or Spell itself to a Personality are performed by the Personality even if the attachment card is not yet in the Personality's unit. For cards whose most recent printing was prior to The Plague War: if the Personality or Follower was targeted by targeting in the base wording of the action’s constraints block (between the two colons). [CHANGED 8 August 2011] The Personality or Follower is explicitly mentioned as a performer in the action's constraints block, using the word "performing."
Para po ito sa FL na card yung Creating Order ito ata yung bagong rulings or specifications dun sa card na ito. | |
|
| |
Yasui CHAMP, THE KOLAT
Posts : 6934 Join date : 2010-03-17
| Subject: Re: any new clarifications? Mon Oct 10, 2011 6:05 pm | |
| di ko nagets penge ng mas madaling example | |
|
| |
Shiba Sensei TATTOED, ELEMENTAL MASTER
Posts : 2762 Join date : 2010-03-08 Location : Phoenix Refugees Temple
| Subject: Re: any new clarifications? Mon Oct 10, 2011 10:23 pm | |
| Ang pagkakaintindi ko sa thread na ito sa skillze basta TPW pataas ng arc pagwalang sinabing at specified "performing" eh di sha performing. Source: [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] … r#p1234361 | |
|
| |
Yasui CHAMP, THE KOLAT
Posts : 6934 Join date : 2010-03-17
| Subject: Re: any new clarifications? Mon Oct 10, 2011 11:33 pm | |
| hmm... so if nagbow ako ng follower for peasant at hindi nkalagay n performing ung follower d sya performing ??? parang ang gulo | |
|
| |
Shiba Sensei TATTOED, ELEMENTAL MASTER
Posts : 2762 Join date : 2010-03-08 Location : Phoenix Refugees Temple
| Subject: Re: any new clarifications? Tue Oct 11, 2011 2:23 am | |
| cards printed lang tpw, eaw, tdow, Btd, FL lang ang sakop nun basta pag walang nakalagay na performing non performing sha
ang example mo ata eh ang peasant vengeance eh sakop pa nung lumang ruling.
actually naguguluhan pa rin din ako dito...
| |
|
| |
yoritomo raizen ALL CLAN SENSEI, THE GUIDANCE
Posts : 7039 Join date : 2010-03-17
| Subject: Re: any new clarifications? Tue Oct 11, 2011 3:50 am | |
| tama n un una mong sinabi coach me range lng na apektadong cards | |
|
| |
Shiba Sensei TATTOED, ELEMENTAL MASTER
Posts : 2762 Join date : 2010-03-08 Location : Phoenix Refugees Temple
| Subject: Re: any new clarifications? Tue Oct 11, 2011 8:54 am | |
| wahahahaha... tumama din ako sa explaination!!!
| |
|
| |
Yasui CHAMP, THE KOLAT
Posts : 6934 Join date : 2010-03-17
| Subject: Re: any new clarifications? Tue Oct 11, 2011 6:37 pm | |
| sio ibigb sabihin lahat ng cards n naprint tpw pataas.. unless specified n "performing" dun s card hindi sya performing lets say n nerve strike ako...cards in the unit cannot perform dba so hanggat hindi nakalagay na "performing" dun s card pwede pa ako umaksyon??? tama ba?? | |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: any new clarifications? | |
| |
|
| |
| any new clarifications? | |
|